Tesla CEO Elon Musk has expressed his disapproval of a report alleging {that a} robotic from Giga Texas attacked an worker, inflicting accidents. As per Musk, the report, which is predicated on an incident from two years in the past, was shameful.
The report in query was revealed by the Day by day Mail, which ran with the headline “Tesla robotic ATTACKS an engineer at firm’s Texas manufacturing facility throughout violent malfunction – leaving ‘path of blood’ and forcing staff to hit emergency shutdown button.” The publication opted to make use of a photograph of Musk and Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robotic as its main picture.
This text within the “science” part of Day by day Mail makes it seem to be Optimus determined to assault an engineer.
What they’re truly speaking about is an harm involving the Kuka robotic within the manufacturing facility in 2021. Though accidents are horrible they don’t trace at a robotic rebellion pic.twitter.com/GoGsTroJ5u
— Entire Mars Catalog (@WholeMarsBlog) December 27, 2023
Whereas it’s unsurprising to see the Mail undertake a dramatic headline — such is the publication’s typical fashion — using Optimus’ photograph within the article seemed that the humanoid robotic was the one which “attacked” an individual. As famous by social media customers, the phrase “assaults” within the headline implies {that a} robotic decided to harm a human, which is totally false.
Right.
Actually shameful of the media to dredge up an harm from two years in the past as a result of a easy industrial Kuka robotic arm (present in all factories) and indicate that it is because of Optimus now.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 27, 2023
The incident, in any case, concerned a Kuka robotic that’s broadly utilized in factories throughout a variety of industries right this moment, and such robots solely function as they’re programmed. Musk highlighted this in a put up on X, the social media platform previously often known as Twitter. “Actually shameful of the media to dredge up an harm from two years in the past as a result of a easy industrial Kuka robotic arm (present in all factories) and indicate that it is because of Optimus now,” Musk wrote.
I see your level on this context although I feel assault can be utilized for non-sentient topics (rust attacked the metallic). I used the phrase as brief hand in tweets, although not within the story, which appears in depth at systemic points with Tesla’s security tradition, not robotic sentience.
— Becky Peterson (@beckpeterson) December 28, 2023
Musk was fairly right in his assertion, because the incident did occur again in 2021. Curiously sufficient, the Day by day Mail‘s report was truly based mostly on an article from The Data, which revealed an article in November that included the incident. Becky Peterson, who penned The Data‘s article, shared her tackle how the phrase “assault” was used within the context of the story.
“I see your level on this context, although I feel assault can be utilized for non-sentient topics (rust attacked the metallic). I used the phrase as brief hand in tweets, although not within the story, which appears in depth at systemic points with Tesla’s security tradition, not robotic sentience,” Peterson wrote in response to an X consumer who argued that the phrase “assault” implies sentience.
Don’t hesitate to contact us with information suggestions. Simply ship a message to [email protected] to offer us a heads up.
